~This is where you can nominate and vote on articles to be featured on the front page each month.
- Everyone can vote.
- To nominate, simply write your nomination in the Nominees section and sign with your username. You should also add {{Template:FeaturedArticleCandidate}} to the top of the nominated page, which automatically adds it to the Featured article candidate category.
- Previously featured articles can been nominated to be featured on the front page again, but not more than two times in a row. The process of voting is the same.
- To vote for a nomination, simply add Support — (under the template {{Support}}) under the nominee and sign with your username.
- To vote against a nomination, simply add Oppose — (under the template{{Oppose}}) under the nominee and sign with your username
- To express a neutral stance, simply add Neutral — (under the template {{Neutral}}) under the nominee and sign with your username.
- You can change your vote at any time until a decision has been made.
- A limit for how many times you can nominate/vote for an article does not currently exist.
- In order for a nominated article to be chosen for featured article, there has to be a majority of votes supporting it.
Nominees[]
(February 2023) - Nominations (closed); Voting (closed)
- FIFA World Cup (Future of Football) - Lazar-Bat
- For
- Support — Finnicky The Saber-Toothed Squirrel
- Support — Gloatingkitten2503
- Support — Colin
- Support — Bert John Allen
- Support — Moo Moo Mad Farm Fanatic
- Neutral
- Neutral — Wither
- Against
- Oppose — Landon
- For
- College Football Realignment (gloatingkitten2503) - This is an article I put a lot of time and effort into making. I also think it's a nice break from all the political pages that this wiki is mostly used for. I think it is a good candidate for featured article - Gloatingkitten2503
- For
- Support — Finnicky The Saber-Toothed Squirrel
- Support — Gloatingkitten2503
- Support — Wither
- Support — Bert John Allen
- Support — Moo Moo Mad Farm Fanatic
- Neutral
- For
- Second American Civil War (DJK95) - So, since we’re allowed to nominate our own stories, I would like to throw in my hat as well and see what comes out of it. So I would like to nominate this article. As the other great writers above me already said, it went a lot of time and effort into this sequel of my WW3 Story, so I think it’s worth a try. - DJK95
- For
- Support — Finnicky The Saber-Toothed Squirrel
- Support — Gloatingkitten2503
- Support — Landon
- Support — DJK95
- Support — jacob proper
- Support — Bert John Allen
- Support — Moo Moo Mad Farm Fanatic
- Neutral
- Against
- Oppose — Fitzwilliam Darcy
- Oppose — PARZIVAL604
- For
(October 2021) (September 2021)
- Yet We Remain AllianceScoutAiothai (talk) 17:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
(August 2021)
- World War 3 (DJK95) Reminding me of previous winner Frozen War, DJK95 has sunk a lot of work into this one. He's also cool enough to accept constructive criticism from myself and others when disagreements arise, and generally offers solid arguments in defense of his decisions. AllianceScoutAiothai (talk) 06:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- For: Support — Have we never given this a featured article nomination before? I'm shocked, honestly. - Hydrozen
(July 2021)
- Category:Regardless of 2020 - Pretty simple pick in mind, still could use some work, but it is extremely good at nailing it's targeted audience. -Stanlee Hudson
- Against: Oppose — As much as it's "extremely good at nailing it's targeted audience", it has far too little content across the board. - Hydrozen
- Oppose — A little simple considering other articles have a lot more detail. There is a lot of other pages with more detail that I think should be nominated. - Jake
(July 2019) -
- Category:RyansWorld - I think this is a worthy nomination, as it is rich in detail and has varied information from countries to fast food restaurants. As such I propose this scenario for featured status. -Seiga
- For: Support —Fester
- Support —Spacey
- Against: Oppose —EnderAlan04
- Oppose —whoever voted support is going to hell -Eledec
- Oppose — Some ups (Restaurants, being extremely detailed, like Seiga said), but some mostly downs (legalizing pedarasty, page on Nintendo getting bought by Facebook, the homo/transphobia...) (5.4/10) Narissa
- Oppose — Yes, it is detailed, however, it is incredibly implausible and biased. It also takes very anti-christian viewpoints that I feel are extremely outdated and sometimes outright offensive being a Christian. -Ryan
- For: Support —Fester
- Porvenir - I think this is a worthy nomination because the creator AllianceScoutAiothai was worked hard on it. It is mainly about American politics, but it sometimes covers things outside of the United States. That is reason I propose this scenario for featured status - EnderAlan04
- For: Support — While not entirely plausible, the scenario is detailed and clearly a lot of effort and thought was put into it, and on the Timeline page, nearly all of the points are cited, indicating a well-researched scenario. The World War III page is also pretty detailed.
- Against: Oppose —The scenario is intended to be a realistic, grounded scenario. Some of the election results are very strange, and verge on ASB. If I recall correctly, the Libertarian goes from 0 electoral votes to around 290 in a single election. For a serious scenario, I think it misses the mark to be featured. - Fester
- Oppose — Honestly the timeline is not that good, plus things like Somalia being divided between Ethiopia and Kenya is ASB (it's more likely that Somaliland is able to gain international recognition that having Somalia being divided between Kenya and Ethiopia. Not to mention that Saudi Arabia supporting both Christian majority nations to annex an Islamic one would probably not fare well from the Saudis). Seiga
- Oppose — It's unique but (Ottomans 2.0 being my favorite idea), I don't know if it deserves it. It's obviously a libertarian-wank, and but it takes place in such a short time, it's not conceivable./believable. Also John Cena as president is so 2015. Sorry Aiothai. Well composed though. Narissa (It get's a 8.1/10 overall for me)
- Neutral — Lonix
- Reason: It does not feel right to add this to the list of featured scenarios. It does not show the featuring of what most nominated scenarios look like (Frozen War for example). Now, the scenario is decent enough, and although some elections in Porvenir look like pure ASB, there is at least a good deal of reasoning.
- Category:Semper Idem - Very well composed scenario, despite the low amount of articles, I feel that they are of high quality. For instance: Ares Colonial Project. It is also believable given what's going on in the world right now. Narissa (9/10 overall)
- Support: Not a bad scenario, I think the World War III page is very detailed. I wouldn't mind this to be featured to be honest. - EnderAlan04
- Russo-Islamic World War III - I believe it's a good scenario, with nicely written detailing in the article. Made by IvanZelenev, it deserves to be on the future nominees. Take a look at his works before you make an official decision. - Lonix
February 2023 choice[]
Featured — FIFA World Cup (Future of Football)
July 2021 choice[]
Featured — Jake's World
June 2021 choice[]
May 2019 choice[]
Featured — Populist America
April 2019 result[]
Featured — The Expanse
March 2019 result[]
Featured — Frozen War
November 2013 result[]
Featured — The Attitude Era
Comments[]
This is not even a page. This is a category-Ismael777
Category or not, it's still featured. DaneOfScandinavy (talk)
December 2013 results[]
Featured — Technology (Terra Futura)
Comments[]
March 2014 results[]
Featured — Timeline (The Second Renaissance)
Comments[]
May 2014 results[]
Featured — Falco Timeline
Comments[]
July 2014 results[]
Featured — Iran War
September 2016 results[]
Featured — Scenario: The Second Renaissance