Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24660155-20181001135052/@comment-32023146-20181008123549

We could possibly implement a Roman Consulship of sorts where each consul acts independently and has the authority to unilaterally delete articles that are BOTH satirical/stupid (like the baby thing) AND do not explicitly state so. So if you want satire you must make that clear.

For articles that are not necessarily/obviously satire/idiotic, the two/three consuls could discuses before taking action. Therefore they must be active and have a clean line of communication.

The consuls (just call them whatever you want) should also do their normal duties (whatever else admins and bureaucrats do) but when it comes to deleting articles, they should exercise leniency especially when it isn't clear if an article is a troll article. I myself enjoy having fun once in a while with a less than logical article. Magic for example. If it is clear that the author means well and has put lots of effort into it, it should be left alone for example.

As for instances such as foul language and the like, I think that should not be tolerated in-article but a mere editing of the article and WARNING should suffice.