Talk:Scenario: World War III/@comment-99.249.160.40-20140709191630

I like how Russia found the man power to invade north america and europe and middle east at the same time, that is quite a feat i must say. I do not believe this war would not have as much troop movement in southeast asia. More likely you'd see alot of bombing and destruction to infastructure key to the military as to stop troop movement. The US and its numerous allies will fight for their allies but i doubt they'd risk the millions of unecessary casualties you'd recieve from invading China. Rather reinforce controlled territories dig in, and begin bombing as much as they can. Would be the only way to silence China as it's armies would be endless. As for the middle east, outside of nuclear weapons I don't see a way Iran and Syria would be able to beat Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Eygpt, UAE, Isreal and others, much overpowered both by population and technology. Russia would be one of the worst on the European front due to the sheer amount of tanks and land based vehicles they have stockpiled. Not modern tech but just as deadly when used quick enough. Personally and I may be wrong, but I don't see a way in the next 30-40 years that the US or allies could be beaten. Current tech and standing airforce/navy size just to overwhelming but things could certainly change from 50 years and up.