Talk:Discord II: New World Order (Map Game)/@comment-27896700-20181123032945

"Using a nuclear weapon on a location can cause global outrage; Neighboring countries have the possibility to invade your country, to gain control of the nuclear weapons."

Okay, but if I nuke my neighbors so hard it'd be implausible if they didn't collapse... and then I annex them, those neighboring countries wouldn't be able to fight me and secure the nukes.

"Nuclear weapons are allowed to be created once a nation has played for five-plus years, and there is a max of 15 allowed to be created each year."

and

"No implausibilities, after four warnings, your nation will be taken away, and become available to others. If you don't want this happens to you, please do some research about your nation."

These two rules kind of contradict each other in many cases.. like this: If Sidewinder has been playing as the Vatican City for five turns... According to the nukes rule, We could see the Jesus Bomba raining down on Washington D.C. but according to the implausibility rule. Nope. Despite how funny it would be to see the nuclear papacy reestablishing the Roman Empire by harnessing the atom after 20 turns of building nukes, it seems a bit implausible

I understand what you're doing, but you're wording it in an easily disputable way.