Talk:Future's Course III (Map Game)/@comment-32023146-20190411034130/@comment-32023146-20190411122148

Thanks EnderAlan04. I suppose I could have been more concise. ;P

Derp, you're right, that is what you are doing. In fact, that's my point. My point is that by banning it one way and not the other is biased and unfair and an imposition of one's views on others, thus infringing on freedom in a hypocritical way.

If you're gonna oppress someone (that isn't meant as an insult, but as a matter of fact. Government regulations on a party is oppression. It's just that oppression is sometimes necessary and warranted. The question is when) at least be consistent and don't specifically discriminate (in the content of your laws) one way (against conservatives) only.

AniemeNerd, your attitude is regrettable as I clearly stated I was more than willing to continue this debate. Unlike some of the people whom you might or might not have spoken to before, I will not simply cave in to your argument but will in fact defend my well thought out ideas.

If anything it is you that will not listen, and just defensively move your argument everywhere.

"At this point I'm used to your shtick, Kemrii. You might as well just say 'Only I am right for every other argument espouses some form of tyranny/curtailing the free market.'"

First sentence in the quote is an unnecessary insult. Second sentence is a straw-man that I will not bother defending myself against.

"And again, you espouse the same garbage argument you have been in forever. 'I didn't bring free speech into this,' you argue, but you most certainly did. As did you bring in dozens of misnomers, cons and misunderstandings about how literally anything works."

First two sentences in the quote are again untrue. Please outline "the same garbage argument you have been in forever", and identify which part of it is garbage. It is entirely possible that we may be entirely misreading each other's arguments and neither of us are actually arguing with each other, but merely what we think the other person is saying. Hence why I ask you to outline my argument (I will attempt to do the same if you agree).

I fail to see how the final sentence of the second quote even applies to this argument nor does its condescending tone help one bit.

And please don't follow this by saying something along the lines of, "it's too bad you don't understand me, because I understand you".

Anyway, I agree with you, "Let's just put this damn dumpster fire down and enjoy the game."

Unless you wish to proceed...