Talk:World War III (Another WW3)

I loll'd. Why would China attack Pakistan, both being long term allies? India and China are allies? WTF.

And besides, why would bangladesh, a country much poorer than both India and Pakistan even involve itself in such a war when public opinion of India is negative there?

Central asia participating? Not a chance! Where are middle eastern countries in this? It's likely they would be financially backing Pakistan.

Atleast the "western alliance" is a bit realistic (aside from CHINA!!). Who wrote this?

_________________________________ Lame. . . and very unrealistic


 * I disagree, although why would Russia go to war? —Preceding signed comment added by TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:34, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

So it's unrealistic... honestly, I haven't found very realistic scenarios anywhere. Hey, how about include the Danes somewhere, where they conquer the world or something...

Riiiiight, I emphasize, this isn't that unrealistic, and also think about it, most of the things that people post aren't very realistic, just certain hypothetical scenarios that have a small chance of taking place.

Regards,

General Turner, Keeper of Historical Archives 21:17, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

KingKyrie


 * What an unbelievably stupid article! So India calls on it's ally China to help it? What planet do you live on? This unsigned comment was left by the un-registered user 71.41.237.102.

Yeah uh... Not likely. India-Pakistan war, sure, sounds reasonable. Pakistani allies in the former Soviet republics, can't comment on that, don't know that situation. India and China allied? What? No, just no. India would sooner call on Pakistan to help them against Pakistan than they'd call China. And China would sooner nuke themselves than help India if they did call. Also, EarthShield thing is... vaguely plausible. I mean, with the laser technology in development it could be done, but I think someone would have noticed by now if the US was putting armed satellites into orbit. Also, how exactly did the Chinese "strike" the satellites? If with missiles, why couldn't they have knocked out the missiles? Or perhaps a better description of what exactly a "mobile fighting platform" is in order, because I haven't a clue what it is. Also, when and why did China go to war with Russia? Sure, they're not exactly buddy-buddy, but I didn't see any mention of motive or anything like that. Also, "SuperTank" units? Lol? EMP rail guns? Lol? Anyway not a very good story. More realism less fantasy please. 69.109.165.121 22:31, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

A few things (not in any paticular order):


 * an EMP and a railgun are two different things. An EMP would cause a railgun round to fall to the ground (as it needs to be superconductive). Maybe I'm thinking of the Lenz Effect, but an EMP railgun seems a tad contradictory to me.


 * SuperTank? Really?


 * The whole space war. I doubt that:

A: The US is going to develop "Earthshield" in <14 years, especially with the way the US is going.

B: That the Chinese are going to be able to make a "mobile fighting platform" in <14 years. China's space progran is pretty small at this point in time. I can't say definatively that they won't have it, but I doubt it. >80 percent of their population still lives in abject poverty as of today.

C: Russia intervening: I'm doubting that there will even be a Russia in 14 years.

Lord-General of the Temporal Karma BoredMatt 21:58, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

I have renamed the two primary camps involved in the war to increase their relevancy and probability if this were to occur, and I have also condensed some of the camp's members into more broad/general categories. On regards to the actual story of the war itself, I disagree with it for the most part, but decided not to intervene. VicariousD 02:23, October 8, 2011 (UTC)

The USA will never be able to develop the orbital defense network, especially not now that NASA's been cut.

If anything, it would be the EU that developed the program. This is blatantly obvious. Their space program is the most advanced out of all countries.

If anything, they would use this to stop the nuclear attacks because it would effect them a LOT more than the USA, considering the EU is right next to Asia. This would then create a reason for the "eastern" countries to attack Europe to take out the facilities, and engage the EU in a war. America would be obligated to aid Europe. 203.219.251.16 07:35, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Clearly you are not savy to World affairs, Venezuela would fight against Colombia, who would be an Allie to the US.

129.98.48.130 16:31, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Why has this suddenly been formed into a strange, unserious scenario? I don't think that something like this belong to the Future Wiki, it would fit better to Uncyclopedia or something. Daneofscandinavy (talk) 19:17, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Well, we dont know who is gonna cause the war

Clean It
This page needs to be cleaned.

Anonymous192.231.40.3 16:33, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Obama sucks and ended NASA as an actual program. And Obama being a leader in America after 2016 is a ccrime punishable by, and only by death.