Talk:Humanity's Course (Map Game)/@comment-26955071-20151224143157

Map of 2065 - http://i.imgur.com/8JtsZpU.png

Map of Israel (2065) - http://imgur.com/gA3WWTA - As you can see, there are territorial changes descripted in the Gaza Strip and Samaria, including the colouring of Palestinian settlements [Or an area with the majority that identifies themselves as Palestinians and are registered with the APZ [Authority of Palestine Zone]. Of course, it shall be addresed once I eventually finish the remainder of my turn.

With too many subsidary activities simultaniously happening, I wasn't able to actively work on here. Hopefully I can manage submitting my turn today, since I'm done with half of it. Also, welcome back @Victor Troska!

Now, regarding the 2065 summary:

- South Africa never occupied Kenya.

- Bulgaria achieved independene from URMA long ago, due to a referendum. URMA presently occupies Greece and Serbia.

- The purpose of temporary members is to ensure that "every country receives the opportunity to speak in the Security council", which the countries are elected in 2-year terms. If permanent members are the only executive powers in the council that makes decision regarding threats to peace, every nation would resort to flock towards a permanent member and receive a backing. Indeed, the creation of the USNC was to create a balance of the international authority, therefore the most *powerful states would become permanent members, who will be the decisionmakers for the SC when there are disruptions or disputes throughout the world. Non-members can observe AND speak to the Security Council, but they can't vote. In my opinion, abolishing the temporary membership will create an imbalance and an opportunity for permanent members to exploit it.

The Security Council would mean nothing if not governed by a powerful state, but at the same time, will be severely abused if governed by just superpowers.

Question: Because South Africa infringed multiple clauses in the Principles of the UN, should the General Assembly vote to decide the expeling of South Africa may be enforced? If the UN supposedly exists in the timeline, I'm certian the organization must have a form of involvement as a consequence of South Africa's activities. *See Article 6 of the UN Charter*