Talk:Beckoning of the Red Planet (Map Game)/@comment-26955071-20170118163226

Too late to play Japan, too early to take the French.

I'll ROK it. You might have a tough adversary, NO.KO

However, I have many, many questions in mind. I am quite notorious for excessing questioning (See Humanity's Course & China's World Map..):

Are non-national entities selectable? [Political opposition (Examples: US Democratic Party HQ, Government-in-exiles (Prior to 2016 and/or during the game - EG: National Council of Resistance in Iran, former government in vitro coup), areas with sufficient autonomy for player possession (Iraqi Kurdistan, but not US State congresses) or flexible armed opposition [FARC, ISIS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK]) And if non-national entities of any kind are permitted, will selection entirely depend on preexisting events and/or a Mod voting procedure?

What is the level of legitimacy of preexisting treaties? Could aggressive, unprovoked violations of the constitutions pend reconsiderations [Implausibility marks would cause difficulties to players still catching up to the 'ways of the diplomacy'] to maintain the plausibility of the game?

If the player controlling a nation of interest decides to resign, could I resign control of my incumbent nation then change to the nation of interest?

How does the Security Council in-game and the Security Council occupied by the Moderators differ? What are the consequences for the different authory gained by the alternative UNSC, and/or what's the background behind it?

Partitioning turns in the 'Beckoning of the Red Planet' to Q1-4 is something many with depthened aspirations and pragmatic progression in their map games would dearly admire, to which begs the fate in covering indispensible events. For instance, the entire US election progresses are around 5-7Qs [Candidates -> Primaries -> General Election -> Inauguration] once every 10Qs since the inauguration. Annual events such as the Davos World Economic Forums [Occurs at Q1], G7/G20 meetings and perhaps future int. diplomatic meetings would be added later on. It's a piece of map games that couldn't manage to an introduction precisely due to the missing timeframe, and I'm very glad this is now a comtemporary part of the game.

Should players declare a significant, enforcable preposition [Via international ratification, UN General Assembly, war treaty], how will the game moderation notify and respond to conflicts against the said preposition?