Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24660155-20181001135052/@comment-27815744-20181007223826

There is no point trying to categorise things as ‘serious’ or ‘asb’ as everyone has different opinions of these concepts.

I for example would consider an independant Tibet on the the same level of ridiculousness as an independent Wales, but other people might believe it (or even both) to be quite likely.

Some scenarios even start with a clearly ASB premise but then take everything from that point on far more seriously then the majority of ‘realistic articles’ here (i.e. Dawn of Victory 2289).

I agree that blatantly obscene articles should be taken down, and those that do not use standardised title formatting should be renamed. But aside from that just let people do their thing. I doubt anyone here genuinely believes themselves to be some genius political analyst. We, or at least I, do this because I enjoy doing it. If someone likes spending their time writing strange ASB/satirical articles, then who are we to stop them?

Future Wikia is a mess... A patchwork of people’s random, mostly bias, guesses of what the future look like. People need to calm down and stop taking this so seriously. At the end of the day this ain’t Wikipedia.