Talk:2032 United States presidential election (Contra Vim Mortis)/@comment-30696685-20190509055436/@comment-35244253-20190509215653

''"Both support gun control, both are enviromentalists, both support medicare for all, both are anti-war. Need I continue?" ''

Continue for sure. Because they aren't the only policies out there. There's more to politics than that. You're grasping at straws. You've named literally four policies. That is not enough to define a politician. I've already listed the differences, going as far as Tulsi not supporting AOC's trademark bill... There's an abundance of differences you've just ignored. By the looks of it you didn't even read that segment of my message.

For someone who is so trigger happy when it comes to going "MUH HISPANIC DISCRIMINATION REE" you seem to be happy to ignore Tulsi's islamophobic and homophobic past, which is in direct contrast to AOC.

Also, on a side note, Tulsi's anti-war stance involves sticking up for Assad, that's it. I don't think the person who supports torture is exactly a dove.

I didn't bring religion into the JFK debate for the record either.

You did bring religion into the debate, stating how JFK apparently paid with his life for standing up to the Church and that's what makes him a good president according to you.

And also, before making an empty statement, you dismissed what I had said by just going "whatever you say", instead of actually rebuting my points. That sounds a little smug to me.