Talk:Skyfish/@comment-30781296-20161218095735

I'm using a Nikon D5 @ 60 frames per second, using 1/8000th of a second shutter speed, and the RODs I capture are not artifacts of the cameras video technology @ 60 fps?

First, whomever made this statement is absolutely clueless of motion picture technology. The inititial video samples from the 1990's were 24 frames per second. That frame rate is nortorious for motion blurring. However; that blurring completely vanishes @ 30 fps/60 fps/120 fps. So your wordage associated with the so called debunking is totally incorrect. If the sample was imaged @ 60 fps, that means its base shutter speed is 1/60th of a second or greater. Blurring is substantially miminized. However; during the day, because I do have High ISO (4 Million), that means I have the required light to freeze action even under Daylight/nocturnal conditions. If you question the validity of my words, please look at state of the art data created under the cinditions in which you claim attribute to image blurring: http://ufodc.com/page%2024.html