Thread:Azimoff899/@comment-6527064-20190511233054/@comment-35244253-20190512003904

Ben10fan3 wrote: IAmFester96 wrote: Ben10fan3 wrote: Quite the exaggeration you have established here, Fester It is not even a ban threat, I usually practice the 3 strikes rule (I said after 3 times, and I gave a week for him to do it so... lmao). (Also, people have complained about it on the Discord before so I decided to take a stand). You don't get to decide to take a stand based on complaining, Beta. You have to establish it as part of the guidelines first, and that needs to be put to a vote. Also, people can easily be offline for a week to two weeks, or miss your message.

I've been guilty of this many times, and I assume many others have as well. Should he ignore your warnings you will be banning him based on something that personally irrittates you. Fair enough.

But regarding the later statement, I'd probably check his activity and if he's been actively ignoring renaming an image then another warning would go in place but if he's legit been inactive for a week then I'd cut him some slack. I guess that is fair, but only in other situations that are ''explicitly stated in the guidelines. ''It's wrong to just start enforcing rules you've made up. We aren't Alt History. We can come debate this in the staff channel on the Discord should you choose to come back, to be honest it's kinda lonely without you.