Talk:Classic: New Standard Timeline

Looks cool, but a bit confusing. I will certainly work to expand this soon. Paranoid 11:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

This article "Classic: New Standard Timeline" looks like a duplicate of Classic: Standard Timeline with a slightly different linking style. Is this merely a temporary experiment to try out a different linking style? If so, what were the results, and is it time to dispose of this experiment, and then apply what we've learned? If not, then what is it? --DavidCary 04:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)