User talk:Phalanx-a-pedian

Hi, welcome to Future! Thanks for your edit to the Scenario: 2075 (The Second Renaissance)/European Federal Union page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Jonano (Talk) 23:29, 27 July 2009

Hmmm
I believe if a virus mutates it still is called the same thing. . . Like seasonal flu. It changes every year, but is still called seasonal flu. If anything why would they call it Boar flu? It is still mutated from the swine flu virus. . . so it is basically the same strain but the cure doesn't work anymore because it changed. Also you never "explained before". —Preceding signed comment added by TimeMaster (talk • contribs) 20:52, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

what religion are you?
what religion are you? did you read my sorry page!


 * Yes, I just didn't have time to reply. As for my religion, well I have Christian grandparents, and Agnostic parents. I my self have been baptised and attended a Roman catholic elementary (primary) school but have Atheist views. I do not belief in any sort of creator or power. The primary reason I am not religious is because I fell a need to have proof before I believe in something and don't really mind the idea that I have no purpose. My lack of belief is quite complicated and I find it an interesting subject, especially trying to understand the history of religious beliefs (especially Christianity). I hope you don't think that I took offence from your comments, in fact they I found them slightly amusing and was simply thinking of others feelings. JosephK19 23:18, March 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am apoligize for editing the Second Rennasince, I won't mess with it any more, I didn't understand at time because I was new to his WikiAlexanders 23:01, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am apoligize for editing the Second Rennasince, I won't mess with it any more, I didn't understand at time because I was new to his WikiAlexanders 23:01, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Ryans World pages
The ideas that can be found on these pages RW can be bad or offensive, really. But they're just scenarios, and all users have the right to place scenario. And the article was too long and must be maintained. Even if it is to delete it, expect it to be extinguished, not replace the text to "to be deleted". - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 20:45, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would like you to show me the thread where the community has reached consensus to delete those pages. I am against the deletion of these pages because they are too long and should not simply be forgotten. And even that may seem offensive, they have no ideas of personal discrimination, ARE ONLY SCENARIOS, are just a fictional, future or alternative worlds. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 21:07, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * You said that the community has agreed to remove pages RyansWorld: Matriarchy and RyansWorld: Female Authority Defiance Disorder to contain sexism. But you said you do not know exactly where the decision was made. Yet you insist on changing the contents of two pages for a complete removal of the text or by "to be deleted". Please point exactly where the decision was made​​. Without it will be inconvenient to change the pages. If you introduce me to the page, I agree with you ... - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 22:43, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Many of Ryan's pages could be offensive to some, but I agree that they should not be deleted. However, I do wonder if the 3-4 different Matriarchy pages should all be merged into one, as they all pretty much say the same thing. 99.174.92.174 00:52, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * These pages have text that says that female sex is superior to male, really. But that does not make these pages sexist. If so, texts that describe the society in Nazi Germany would be considered racist. And while you do not have support from administrators, should not be changing the text of pages by "to be deleted" or simply deleting the entire content. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 00:11, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Stop the Edit war
Lets just keep the pages like they are for now until a vote is reached. An edit war just clogs up the recent activity bar. LurkerLordB 14:43, April 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well considering that it was the very act of them being reinstated that started this hole thing, I think it best thing to do is to put them beck to how they were, with "To be deleted" and nothing else. However, as it is clear that Edwardo is not going to back down, and will simply continue to fuel the edit war, and as I don't like them and want it to stop, I have gone with a compromise, with the exception of the Female Authority Defiance Disorder page, which is plane wrong, and the edits of the same theme made since the start of the vote. JosephK19 16:24, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Good solution
Some time ago, we were competing editions in the pages about Matriarchy. But now you found a good solution: to say that the content of the pages are being discussed at the outset, without erasing the contents. Okay if you do this with every page. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 16:59, April 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd like to keep the original wording, as I feel it is better a better use of English. In addition, while this is a compromise, I draw the line at the "FADD" page as it is simply wrong. It states that this is a real things, which it is not, and claims that it is the cause of all evil, and that it is caused by the Y chromosome. This goes beyond mearly offensive or stupid and is simply sexist and blatantly wrong. This being the case, it goes, I just don't have to power to remove it. Please do not reverse that edit. I also draw the line at the content added to the Lunar protectorate and the RyansWorld time-line which was not there prior to the starting of the vote. I have compromised, I now urge you to do the same by conforming to where I have drawn the line and by removing the line you added to users talk pages asking them to vote with you. JosephK19 17:23, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Reply
I only ask you to stop reverting my edits. All disputed pages are marked as possibly offensive or inappropriate. That is enough or you want more? - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 18:27, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * My edits are impartial, unlike yours. My edits include warnings before the matriarchy pages saying that the content CAN BE offensive. While your edits say that the content IS offensive. While there is no administrator intervention, the pages must be in accordance with my edits. If you no longer revert my edits, you will have a partial and interim solution. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 00:09, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pages Deleted
The week has passed, the votes have been tallied, and the consensus for deletion was passed by a huge margin. Because I am no admin, I simply turned the pages into redirects, therefore deleting their contents and removing them from the main search. LurkerLordB 21:21, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Rejoinder
Joseph, the vote that you created was that if the community agreed, a collection of pages would be deleted. The vote was taken, and the community agreed to delete pages. Since then what you should have done was to mark the pages as inappropriate (without deleting content) and notify an administrator to delete them. I was faithful to participate in your vote. But your vote did not say anything about "delete content of pages", it really spoke to delete the entire page itself. And your page will also not speak of removing portions of other articles. For these reasons I can not agree with you. If you want to delete the pages, talk Jonano or other administrators. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 19:59, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Project Paladin's Name
When I type in 'Project' no thing besides Project Infintity but Project Paladin doesn't show up is their any way to fix this? Bobalugee1940 19:56, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

I am not reffering to a search but when you just type it in to the search bar the suggestions that appear. Bobalugee1940 23:41, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Stop
The vote did not talk about changing the content of the pages, it talked about deleting them. And also not talking about changing the content of other pages. And stop scratching text on the talk page of Jonan, that list speaks of the pages there is war, not full page that the community decided to delete. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 00:42, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

It's over
I have no more problems with the pages RyansWorld: Timeline of Canadamerica and RyansWorld: Lunar Protectorate. Do what you want with them. But with the pages that are to be deleted, leave as they are now. They will be deleted in 4 days. NO NEED FOR MORE EDIT WAR! - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 21:07, April 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * These pages will be deleted in 4 days. There is no reason to edit them more. Please stop it. There is no reason for it. Let the pages there until Sunday. - Eduardo Sellan Brazilian 01:13, April 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * I actually agree with Eduardo on this one, the edit war has dragged on long enough, they might as well be kept so people can see why they are being deleted. LurkerLordB 02:11, April 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I can't agree. The vote has been held and the verdict was that they go, Jonano only said 4 days to give Eduardo a chance to save the content somewhere else. He has done this (and moved it to another wiki, which I believe was inappropriate, and will most likely lead to a repeat of this), but it can now go ASAP. There is no reason to keep the content and no-one needs to see it. I'm also refusing to let it stay simply because one user wants it to for stupid reasons. Yes it has dragged on far too long, but the fact is that there is one user ignoring the proper process, and I'm not prepared to let it drop. There is no real reason to keep them, but there is to remove the content. If anyone really want's to see it they can look at the history, but this way no-one accidentally comes across it (like young kids for example). JosephK19 06:41, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Project Paladin
Is the problem with using the Halo franchise or is it offensive (if so I didn't mean to) ? Bobalugee1940 11:13, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Ultra Preteritus
I have been very busy lately and often fail to grammer my articles, thank you for clearing up my timeline.

Alexanders 17:44, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

UK Politics
In regards to Cameron's chances for re-election, I am of the opinion that by 2015 the UK economy will recover and Cameron will reap the reward at the ballot box.

Bill, 15:20 (EST), May 11, 2011

Future Map Game
It is now starting Bobalugee1940 17:14, May 21, 2011 (UTC)