User talk:Gjeremy

Please help me to improve my thinking by giving me your opinions
Hello, Gjeremy

Past Posts

 * Modular Robots - Scenario or Article? JC 20:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Anime page brought back... still marginal though.... JC 20:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Newer Posts

 * We seem to have a convention of having a 'space' after the ':' in 'Scenario:'... I'm not that fussed about it, but when creating new scenarios better to have it than not. JC 23:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

NIAC input
I noticed that there aren't any mentions of the NASA Institute of Advanced Concepts (NIAC) on this site. I haven't tried to sift through to find if there are any references to NIAC sponsored studies (see the NIAC site), but there are many concepts there that come out into other media. These studies seem pertinent, do you think there would be much interaction if I made sure NIAC was ok with their stuff being published here? Jwiley80 02:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

NIAC would go in the article NASA or be a separate scenario page the branches off from NASA. The point of Future wiki is to share Ideas. If NIAC was not ok with their stuff being published here than they should be privately funded and not part of the government agency NASA at all. All government knowledge not sensitive to national security is accessible under the Freedom of information Act.