Talk:Volatile Disposition (Map Game)/@comment-32023146-20181225070640/@comment-31417419-20181225151954

1) If you see implausibility, you call out implausibility. Strange, as you've barely said anything about the country in Europe that developed a technocracy out of seemingly nowhere amidst international chaos, creates technology out of thin air and foolishly thinks that throwing unmanned drones at ICBMs will stop them-

Oh.

That's your nation.

Look, Kemrii, you wanted a technocracy, I gave you a technocracy. You want your ridiculous military tactics that don't hold up to reality, I give you that. You know why I did that? Because it doesn't threaten the integrity of the map game when you come up with that. It does when you begin to look at implausibility then attempt to act in an implausible manner even beyond that you have already created.

Any other person? I would have asked them to consider another direction. Technocracies are physically impossible in any system because of how humans are, so they in themselves are implausibilities. Nobody listens to debates every weekend. Nobody ever listens to politicians on a regular basis. We're trying to get our work done, we're going out to the movies, we're spending time with family, doing what we want. Any other person I would have struck your entire nation down from the beginning. But I made that exception for you.

Don't abuse the amount of leeway I've already given you. I don't care that you're still going to call out others for implausibility despite your own and attempt to act on it because as per usual you don't seem to respect the rules that map game creators enforce.

These antics tick me off. I'm warning you very strongly, don't try to mess with plausibility. I'll call out people when they're implausible. In the meantime, how about figuring out how and why people vote and why in an environment such as that of this Map Game technocracies are impossible?

Seperately: Ordenstaat.

I'm glad that you changed the absurd amounts of railguns you said you had converted in your motorised military. But just note: Railguns require several things; including a highly advanced reload system and immense amounts of sustained electricity to fire. Your AI as well is untested in actual combat environments and will likely be largely ineffective in its first battles, especially during its first years in service. (This goes out to other AI system users as well.)

I know you're not doing it intentionally and you're rather busy, but could you at the very least ensure that in the future, your references to German technology don't exceed the plausible limits of this time period? Remember, 2068 is only 50 years away. We won't have massive changes, except with the introductions of prototype weapons such as your AI systems and the nanobotlia infection in East Asia. Just keep that in mind. I'm liking the turns, to be honest.