Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24660155-20181001135052/@comment-28637315-20181008145039

I may just be echoing other people here by accident, but from my perspective articles that have little to no substance or context should be subject to deletion, but then again it's a case-by-case instance where the article may just be unfinished.

A rough outline of what's allowed and what's not would be much better than a rigid rule that may take down potentially great scenarios. Take the Second Renaissance for instance. A hyper-America is believable to most but a hyper-Mexico? Much less so. Yet, the premise is pretty good.

This could apply to seemingly random articles that may correlate to a much larger web the creator has intended it for. Articles with substance and not just "hey look it's a gallery of the descendants of Donald Trump I made by merging photos in Microsoft Paint". Not that we've actually seen a memey article that had much substance.