Talk:Scenario: Environmental destruction/@comment-4997457-20140913200429/@comment-4997457-20140914185829

You don't understand why scientist would make up something/ Did you not read the full thing. NASA, Solar Scientists, people in Agricultural Science, The European Space Agency were all sources saying that the opposite of sea level rise was happening

The australian Bureau of Meterology has had to apologize for adjusting the temputure on the Weather Forecast to make it appear warmer, just after crops have failed due to frost in August/September in AUSTRALIA

link : []

A main reason governments would lie and fail to put anything to stop global warming in large expenditures in money. You can get alot of money taxing "Global warming inducing chemicals/toxins" and have a good sounding back-up excuse. I think those chemicals should be banned or reduced and converted to green energy anyway because it destroys the ecological system in the local area but they arn't trying to convert to green energy or put laws in place to promote it that much. When did you see electric cars subsidied? No, they want the local enviroment damaging polution so they can tax it becuase the governments of the world are predominatly capitalist. They like big bussiness and forcing them to spend big money to changed would be heartbreaking, because nobody would profit. The big companys get taxed by barely anything but the citizens get taxed alot. Car tax, Carbon tax,  these mostly hit the average person becuase a couple thousand or million is little for a company while switching to ecosytem friendly things is expensive in the short term, (and companys, like most humans, struggle to think long term). These taxes give the government money all justified under "Global warming prevention" Yet i struggle to see a fall in Carbon dioxide levels.