Talk:Future's Course III (Map Game)/@comment-32023146-20190411034130/@comment-32023146-20190411114334

I have not involved free speech in this debate so I have no idea where that came from. Your defences are at best disingenuous. You should take a good long look at yourself in the mirror regarding the second part of your point 4. "Fight their way to recognition", what is that supposed to mean? If by recognition you mean being the most talked about people group in modern times I'm sure they've succeeded. You also seem to be reading me to be a conservative when in fact I am a left-leaning libertarian. The truth is I simply attempt to be consistent and unbiased.

You also fail to see how laws literally requiring you to serve people you do not like at the threat of fines and jail-time is in itself discriminatory (because it does not apply the other way to liberals refusing service to neo-Nazis and the like [what happened to discrimination there? As I said, biased and one-sided enforcement of ideology]).

It is forced labour.

Finally, I do not think it reflects well that your point 5 dismisses me as incoherent and ideological when I am a left-leaning libertarian that simply despises ideology, and resorting to character attacks isn't ideal in a debate.

Not to mention you literally link me to “We socialists are trying to save capitalism,” the New Deal lawyer Jerome Frank remarked to the economist Stuart Chase, “and the damned capitalists won’t let us.”

Talk about incoherent ideology. From that one sentence I can tell where you stand and a sizeable portion of what you support.

Lastly, I am aware the irony in my last three paragraphs. If you will take the fight there, I will follow.

I have nothing truly against you, just your ideas. May this debate continue should you wish.